Rensenhouse v. Seeley
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Joseph. (Loveridge, J.) Assumpsit under How. Stat. § 4225. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This is an action of assumpsit brought under section 4225, How. Stat., to recover money paid defendant as agent of the Fraternal Alliance, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Illinois.
Suit was commenced by summons before a justice of the peace of St. Joseph county. The declaration was on the common counts in assumpsit. Plea, general issue, *605with notice of special matters of defense. Plaintiff recovered judgment in a justice’s court. Defendant appealed to the circuit court for St. Joseph county, where the cause was tried before the court without a jury, and defendant had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WetherbeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- People v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Taggart v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens' Life-Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Laub v. Furnas CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
- Knights of the Modern Maccabees v. Commissioner of InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1908