People v. Howard
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Information for unlawful solicitation of insurance. Respondent was convicted.
1Opinion of the CourtMarston, J.
This case comes up on exceptions after verdict and before judgment.
The prosecution was commenced for .an alleged violation of Act 148 of the Session Laws of 1881, p. 140, being entitled “ An Act to prevent the soliciting or issuing of unauthorized fire or inland marine insurance .policies in this State.”
The first count in the information charges the respondent with being an agent and solicitor of the "Western Manufacturers’ Insurance Company of Chicago, Illinois, and that he did, as such agent and solicitor, unlawfully transact and solicit business within the State of Michigan for said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Christian Union v. YountSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Thompson v. WatersMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- American Insurance v. StoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Home Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by39 opinions
- People v. WolfeMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. CainMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. RaymondMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.