Legal Opinion

Ekstrom v. D. Dierssen, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1935No. 24963. Department TwoPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeraghty, J.

This suit was brought by plaintiff Ekstrom to recover upon a promissory note for thirty- two hundred dollars, and to foreclose a real estate mortgage given as security. While numerous defendants are named in the complaint, an appearance was made only by D. Dierssen, Inc., a corporation, D. Dierssen, individually, and D. Dierssen as executor of the estate of Sophia Dierssen, his deceased wife. The cause was tried to the court, and findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to the plaintiff were made and judgment entered for the amount found due upon the note, and for the foreclosure of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McKinley v. Mineral Hill Consolidated Mining Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Brundage v. Home Savings & Loan Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mercy v. A. I. Hall & Son, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harrison v. PugaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  2. Puget Sound Pulp & Timber Co. v. Clear Lake Cedar Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Graves v. Cascade Natural Gas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API