Legal Opinion
United States v. Hill
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 1, 1982No. Crim. 79-161PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DITTER, District Judge.
Paul Hill was convicted for a second time of five counts of distributing heroin. His post-trial motions contend the second trial was barred by collateral estoppel and double jeopardy, and that there was error in pre-trial and trial rulings. For the reasons which follow, his motions must be denied.
Because the facts have been discussed in my prior opinion, 481 F.Supp. 558 (E.D.Pa. 1979), reversed and remanded, 655 F.2d 512 (3d Cir.1981), 1 I will only mention them briefly. Hill was employed as a clothing salesman for Krass Bros, in Philadelphia. On March 9, 1979,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Morris W. Gordon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Sealfon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- United States v. PhibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Dowling, Reuben. Government of the Virgin Islands v. Dowling, Reuben. Appeal of Reuben DowlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. PhibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Pennsylvania Trust Co. v. Dorel Juvenile Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.