Legal Opinion

United States v. Phibbs

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 5, 1993No. Nos. 92-5509, 92-5512, 92-5521 to 92-5523, 92-5529 and 92-5730PublishedCited by 138 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Defendants, Raymond Huckelby, Diane Whited, Robert Phibbs, Victor Rojas, and Robert Murr appeal their convictions arising from their participation in a cocaine distribution ring operating in Tennessee and Kentucky. In addition, Phibbs and Rojas challenge the appropriateness of their sentences.

Huckelby takes issue with the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions. Along with the other defendants, he also expressly adopts and incorporates by reference all common issues raised by his co-defendants.

Whited raises the following allegations of error:…

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by138 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. McPherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Robert Dale Murr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Mcpherson v. KelseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. John W. Byrd, Jr. v. Terry L. Collins, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000

133 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API