Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. State Tax Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 2007No. Docket Nos. 262487, 262488, 262500, 263188, 264154, 265686 and 267565PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

METER, EJ.

These consolidated appeals primarily require us to interpret certain language contained in the Natural Resources and Environmental Frotection Act (NREFA), 324.101 et seq. Specifically, they require us to determine whether certain equipment installed by Ford Motor Company (Ford), DaimlerChrysler Corporation (DC), and Detroit Diesel Corporation (DD) qualifies for tax exemptions under part 59 of the NREPA, MCL 324.5901 et seq., because the equipment constitutes “facilities,” see MCL 324.5901, “designed and operated primarily for the control, capture, and re moval of pollutants from the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Ayar v. Foodland DistributorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Covert Township Assessor v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Meijer, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. In Re D'Amico EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  2. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Daimlerchrysler Corp v. Michigan State Tax CommMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Daimlerchrysler Corp v. Michigan State Tax CommMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API