Legal Opinion

State v. Kirkman

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 11, 1977No. 13PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAKE, Justice.

After the jury, including two alternates, had been selected and impaneled, the court recessed for the day. Before anything else was done the following day, one of the twelve jurors brought to the attention of the court the fact that she had observed a communication between a lady with whom she worked and counsel for one of the defendants and believed it possible that this lady was a relative of such defendant, of which fact the juror had not previously been aware. Upon inquiry by the court, it developed that the lady who had so communicated with the attorney was the wife of the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State v. WestbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. BartsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. PartonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API