Holmberg v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtGkeeN, Judge
The plaintiff brings this suit to recover a balance of $1,160 for aerial photographic work which he contracted to do and did perform for $2,796.37 and on which the Government has paid him $1,636.37 and has withheld, as liquidated damages at the rate of $20 a day, $140 for an alleged delay of seven days in getting his plane at the airport ready to begin work and $1,020 for an alleged delay of fifty-one days in *507transmitting the final prints, etc., to be furnished the Soil Conservation Service at Washington.
It is contended by the defendant that under the contract with plaintiff and the facts in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Smelting and Refining Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Griffiths v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
- Cathell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1911
- Mueller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Willems Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Oklahoma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. Winston Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.