Legal Opinion

Oklahoma v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided June 3, 1959No. Cong. No. 10-55PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaeamoee, Judge

This case comes before the court pursuant to H. Res. 278, 84th Congress, 1st Session. The resolution refers to this court H.R. 5421, entitled “A bill for the relief of the State of Oklahoma,” with instructions to make findings of fact and conclusions “sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature and character of the demand, as a claim legal and equitable against the United States, and the amount, if any, legally or equitably due from the United States to the claimant.”

The claim of the State of Oklahoma arises out of a settlement agreement entered into between the United States and the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Phillips v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Edgar v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1959
  4. Smith v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Holmberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
  2. Baggett Transportation Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  3. Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. Baggett Transportation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  5. ITT Gilfillan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API