Legal Opinion

United States v. Tyson

Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 20, 1996No. NMCM 95 00008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DeCICCO, Senior Judge:

In this case, we hold that where it is necessary to appoint a substitute defense counsel after trial to represent a convicted service member for the purpose of reviewing the recommendation of the staff judge advocate, and where the service member does not keep counsel advised of his or her whereabouts while on appellate leave, the service member will not be entitled to relief because the substitute counsel was unable to make contact with him and form an attorney-client relationship, as mentioned in Rule for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.j 1106(f)(2), before examining the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. PaleniusUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. BonoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. IversonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  4. United States v. LeaverUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. MoseleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. GarmanArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API