Legal Opinion
McCormick v. City of Lawrence
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided June 24, 2004No. CIV.A.03-2195-GTVPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VanBEBBER, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Dale E. McCormick and Curtis A. Kastl II, proceeding pro se, bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants Mik Shanks, Scott Hofer, Kirk Fultz, Dean Brown, Warren Burket, Mike Pattrick, Leo Souders, Justin Stipanovich, and James White — all Lawrence, Kansas police officers — police chief Ron Olin, and the City of Lawrence, violated their First, Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights during and after Plaintiffs’ arrests in July 2002 and in connection with a sobriety…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Westchester County Independence Party v. AstorinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Mocek v. City of AlbuquerqueDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Youngblood v. QuallsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2018
- Chalfant v. TubbDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Mata Ex Rel. J.A.M v. City of FarmingtonDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.