Chalfant v. Tubb
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
EAGAN, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.# 17) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Dkt.# 42). Defendants ask the Court to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety, or in the alternative, defendants seek dismissal of specified claims. Plaintiffs request that the Court strike exhibit B attached to defendant’s reply (Dkt.# 41), a letter from plaintiff Patrick Chalfant to defendant Barry Tubb, because it attempts to provide factual support for defendants’ arguments beyond the allegations of the complaint.
I
Plaintiffs filed this action for…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- CTI SERVICES LLC v. HaremzaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
- DP Creations v. Adolly.comDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
- GREER v. MOONDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2024
- Greer v. MoonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
- Manansingh v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.