Legal Opinion

Chalfant v. Tubb

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided August 28, 2006No. 05-CV-0549-CVE-SAJPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

EAGAN, Chief Judge.

Now before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.# 17) and Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike (Dkt.# 42). Defendants ask the Court to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety, or in the alternative, defendants seek dismissal of specified claims. Plaintiffs request that the Court strike exhibit B attached to defendant’s reply (Dkt.# 41), a letter from plaintiff Patrick Chalfant to defendant Barry Tubb, because it attempts to provide factual support for defendants’ arguments beyond the allegations of the complaint.

I

Plaintiffs filed this action for…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CTI SERVICES LLC v. HaremzaDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
  2. DP Creations v. Adolly.comDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2023
  3. GREER v. MOONDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2024
  4. Greer v. MoonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024
  5. Manansingh v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API