Multi Denominational Ministry of Cannabis & Rastafari, Inc. v. Gonzales
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WALKER, Chief Judge.
On July 12, 2006, plaintiffs sued in pro per seeking, inter alia, declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent defendants from interfering with the exercise of their religion, which involves the use of marijuana. Doc # 1. Defendants have moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). Doc ## 21, 34, 24. For reasons that follow, the court GRANTS defendants’ motions to dismiss.
I
A
“On a motion to dismiss, all well-pleaded allegations of material fact are taken as true and construed in a light most favorable to the non-moving party.” Wyler Summit Partnership v.…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSN. v. Maxwell-JollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Shattuck v. Bondurant (In Re Shattuck)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Graves v. State of OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- No Tan Lines Republik v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
- Olson Kundig Inc v. 12th Avenue Iron IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.