Legal Opinion

No Tan Lines Republik v. Anderson

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided May 13, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00870Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 NO TAN LINES REPUBLIK, Case No. 2:24-cv-00870-GMN-NJK 8 Plaintiff(s), Order 9 v. 10 JIM ANDERSON, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 This case was initiated without an attorney by Plaintiff no Tan lines Republik, a non-profit 13 organization. Docket No. 1 at 2. 14 Although

28 USC § 1654

permits parties to plead their own cases personally, it does not 15 extend to non-individuals. Eagle Associates v. Bank of Montreal,

926 F.2d 1305, 1307

(2d 16 Cir.1991). “Corporations and other unincorporated associations must appear in court through an 17…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. In Re America West Airlines, Debtor. Seymour Licht v. America West Airlines Equity Security Holders CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Multi Denominational Ministry of Cannabis & Rastafari, Inc. v. GonzalesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API