Legal Opinion

Milwaukee County v. Parham

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 11, 1979No. 79-641PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDecker, C.J.

This case was dismissed by the trial court because the officer who took the respondent into custody under the emergency detention procedures set forth in sec. 51.15 of the statutes was not the same officer who signed the detention statement. We hold that under the specific facts of this case, there was substantial compliance with the statute and reverse.

On March 6, 1979, Officers Robert Haller and Robert Rawski were called to a laundromat where respondent was allegedly creating a disturbance. The respondent was taken into custody by Officer Rawski. A detention statement was prepared as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Schmidt v. LessardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  4. Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1974
  5. Milwaukee County v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Mental Condition of Shirley JCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. In Matter of WJCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. W.J.C. v. County of VilasCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API