W.J.C. v. County of Vilas
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1ConcurrenceCane, P.J.
I agree with the majority that telephone testimony is admissible in involuntary commitment hearings. I write separately, however, to emphasize the constitutional distinction between criminal actions and civil commitment proceedings. For purposes of due process analysis, a civil commitment proceeding cannot be equated to a criminal prosecution. Addington v. Texas, 441 U.S. 418, 428 (1979); see also Milwaukee County v. Parham, 95 Wis. 2d 21, 25, 289 N.W.2d 326, 328 (Ct. App. 1979).
A civil commitment constitutes a significant deprivation of liberty that requires due process protection.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Parham v. J. R.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. BauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- Milwaukee County v. ParhamCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979