Legal Opinion

Morrison & Skaug v. Connery

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1929No. File No. 6833PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurch, J.

This cause is before us at this time on an order to show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. Proceedings were had in the circuit court of Dewey county by plaintiffs against defendant, in which defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint. The demurrer was stricken as frivolous, and judgment for plaintiff entered on the complaint. Afterwards defendant moved to vacate the judgment and for leave to answer. This motion was denied. Defendant then moved for a new trial, and that was denied. Thereupon defendant appealed to this court, serving a notice of appeal as follows;

“Please take…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Hawkins v. HubbardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Anderson v. HultmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Hackett v. GundersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  5. McVay v. BridgmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Village of Aurora v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Potter v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Moore v. HahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Grieves v. DanaherSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Furman v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API