Legal Opinion

Bissell v. Kommareddi

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1993No. Docket 136242PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

In this medical malpractice lawsuit, plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s decision to grant defendants’ motion for summary disposition based on the statute of limitations provided in MCL 600.5851(7); MSA 27A.5851(7). Plaintiff contends that the statute of limitations violates equal protection because it creates an unreasonable and arbitrary distinction between minors with tort claims based on medical malpractice and minors with tort claims based on other theories of recovery. Plaintiff also argues that the statute violates due process because it eliminates access to the courts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Forest v. ParmaleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Johnson v. Harnischfeger Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Heinz v. Chicago Road Investment Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Neal v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Sills v. Oakland General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Yaldo v. North Pointe InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Vargo v. SauerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API