Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Harnischfeger Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 13, 1982No. Docket Nos. 64682, 64689. (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*107Williams, J.
We granted leave to appeal especially to consider "whether the statute of limitations contained in MCL 418.361(2)(g); MSA 17.237(361)(2)(g) is constitutionally infirm on equal protection and due process grounds.”1 Subdivision (2)(g) reads:
"(2) Total and permanent disability, compensation for which is provided in section 351 means:
"(g) Permanent and total loss of industrial use of both legs or both hands or both arms or 1 leg and 1 arm; for the purpose of this subdivision such permanency shall be determined not less than 30 days before the expiration of 500 weeks from the date of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. HubbardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.