Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Harnischfeger Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1982No. Docket Nos. 64682, 64689. (Calendar No. 14)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*107Williams, J.

We granted leave to appeal especially to consider "whether the statute of limitations contained in MCL 418.361(2)(g); MSA 17.237(361)(2)(g) is constitutionally infirm on equal protection and due process grounds.”1 Subdivision (2)(g) reads:

"(2) Total and permanent disability, compensation for which is provided in section 351 means:
"(g) Permanent and total loss of industrial use of both legs or both hands or both arms or 1 leg and 1 arm; for the purpose of this subdivision such permanency shall be determined not less than 30 days before the expiration of 500 weeks from the date of…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Carmichael v. Southern Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. McDougall v. SchanzMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Blue Cross & Blue Shield v. GovernorMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. People v. HubbardMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Caterpillar, Inc v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nelson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API