Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Stephens

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1994No. 64099PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harper, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Joshua Stephens, appeals from his conviction for drug loitering following the entering of a nolo contendere plea in the Cleveland Municipal Court. Appellant submits that the ordinance under which he was convicted, Section 607.19 of the Cleveland Codified Ordinances, is unconstitutionally vague and overly broad. He, therefore, argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss as the ordinance violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We find merit in appellant’s argument, and conclude that the complaint issued by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Krause v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. City of Akron v. RowlandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hogan v. HoganOhio Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. MathisOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. City of Cleveland v. BranchCity of Cleveland Municipal Court · 2000
  3. State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API