MacGinniss v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.
Montana Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. AotxoN by John MacGrinniss against the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company and another, impleaded with A. S'. Bigelow and others. From orders granting temporary injunctions, defendants separately appeal. STATEMENT OE THE CASE.
Read the full summary
Appeal from District Court, Silver Bow County; William Clancy, Judge. AotxoN by John MacGrinniss against the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company and another, impleaded with A. S'. Bigelow and others. From orders granting temporary injunctions, defendants separately appeal. STATEMENT OE THE CASE. This action was brought by the plaintiff, as a minority stockholder in the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper and Silver Mining Company — hereinafter referred to as the Montana Company — on behalf of himself and all other minority stockholders occupying the same position as…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bbantly
At the hearing in this court counsel for plaintiff interposed motions to' dismiss both' appeals on various grounds, among others, that the order of October 23d is not appealable, and that the notice is ambiguous and uncertain, in that it does, not appear therefrom to which order it refers. There is no merit in the motion so far as it is directed at the appeal from the order of the court entered in the minutes granting the injunction. The notice is couched in separate paragraphs. By reading the first paragraph with each of the other two; there is a separate and distinct notice of each appeal,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- People ex rel. Peabody v. Chicago Gas Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
- People v. North River Sugar Refining Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Booth v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- Great Northern Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. Gateway Mortuaries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1930
- McConnell v. Combination Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
- Hames v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1950
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.