Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Kurth v. Grinde

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1934No. 7,243PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

This is a proceeding instituted in the district court of Cascade county to compel the respondents above named, appellants here, to reinstate relator Lloyd S. Kurth, as water registrar of the city of Great Falls. The cause was tried to the court on an agreed statement of facts. So far as material, the agreed statement shows that the five relators, other than Lloyd S. Kurth, and the five appellants, other than Martin Grinde and Edwin A. Pierse, are aldermen of the city of Great Falls; that in December, 1927, the city passed and approved an ordinance establishing the office of water registrar…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Continental Supply Co. v. AbellMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Snell v. WelchMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State ex rel. Begeman v. NaptonMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Reddell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Barton v. AlexanderIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mills v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State Ex Rel. Hagerty v. RafnMontana Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Radermacher v. EckertIdaho Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Gill v. RafnMontana Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API