Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Hansen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1958No. 9751PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:

The appeal in this cause arises from the following facts. Dave and Ben Hansen were brothers doing business as partners. Managerial dificulties arose with the result that Dave Hansen brought an accounting action against Ben Hansen to establish their mutual obligations and to settle the division of the partnership property between themselves. From the judgment rendered in the district court in that action, Ben Han*292sen appealed. That appeal was decided by this court in the case of Hansen v. Hansen, 130 Mont. 175, 297 Pac. (2d) 879. Rehearing on the appeal was denied June 11,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Haebler v. . MyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Pittsburgh & West Virginia Gas Co. v. Pentress Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Ward v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Vonica v. Unknown Foreign & Non-Resident Heirs of Eli StoianMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. In Re Stoian's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Jangula v. United States Rubber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Reil v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API