Tuggle v. Allright Parking Systems, Inc.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Justice.
We granted this appeal to determine whether a party with a derivative claim—loss of consortium—is entitled to challenges under the peremptory jury challenge statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 22-3-105.
We conclude that the clear and unambiguous language of the jury challenge statute provides additional peremptory challenges to a party with a derivative claim, 1 and that a new trial is required because the denial of that statutory right constitutes prejudice to the judicial process. In the interest of judicial economy, since a new trial is required, we have also decided…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Lee v. Colorado Department of HealthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Feltch v. General Rental Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Worrall v. Kroger Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. PettusTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
- Penley v. Honda Motor Co., Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Lavin v. JordonTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- Carter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Cross v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.