Legal Opinion
Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 13, 2006No. UP-3303; A128917PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, S. J.
Petitioner Department of Corrections (DOC) seeks judicial review of an order of the Employment Relations Board (ERB), contending that ERB erred in holding that DOC committed an unfair labor practice as defined in ORS 243.672(l)(e) when it failed to bargain over proposed changes to the bid schedule for employee shifts and days off. ERB ordered DOC to cease and desist from refusing to bargain over such changes. DOC contends that, under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with DOC employees, it had the right to “schedule work” without engaging in additional…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Oregon School Employees Ass'n v. Rainier School District No. 13Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Enloe Medical Center v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Eugene Police Employees' Ass'n v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Marion County Law Enforcement Ass'n v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Arlington Education Ass'n v. Arlington School District No. 3Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Portland Fire Fighters' Ass'n, Local 43, IAFF v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Assn. of Oregon Corrections Emp. v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2013