Legal Opinion

State v. Arreola

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 15, 2011No. 29164-2-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSiddoway, J.

¶1 Pretextual traffic stops are prohibited by the Washington Constitution. Const. art. I, § 7; State v. Ladson, 138 Wn.2d 343, 353, 979 P.2d 833 (1999). In this case, a patrol officer followed Gilbert Chacon Arreola’s blue Chevy Cavalier for over a half mile because it fit the description of a car reportedly driven by a suspected drunk driver. While watching for signs of impaired driving, the officer noticed the car was equipped with a modified muffler in violation of state vehicle equipment requirements. Without having seen any evidence of impaired driving, the officer pulled over Mr.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ArreolaWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State Of Washington, V Thomas D. EspeyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. State v. ArreolaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API