Legal Opinion

State v. Arreola

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 15, 2011No. 29164-2-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

260 P.3d 985 (2011)

163 Wn. App. 787

STATE of Washington, Respondent,

v.

Gilberto Chacon ARREOLA, Appellant.

No. 29164-2-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

September 15, 2011.

Susan Marie Gasch, Gasch Law Office, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

D. Angus Lee, Grant County Prosecuting Attorney, Ryan S. Valaas, Attorney at Law, Ephrata, WA, for Respondent.

SIDDOWAY, J.

¶ 1 Pretextual traffic stops are prohibited by the Washington Constitution. CONST. art. I, § 7; State v. Ladson, 138 Wash.2d 343, 353, 979 P.2d 833 (1999). In this case, a patrol officer followed Gilbert Chacon Arreola's blue Chevy…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API