Darwin v. Town of Cookeville
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss
The Chancellor sustained a motion to dissolve an injunction in this cause on bill and answer, and dismissed the bill, filed to restrain the defendants, Town of Cooke-ville, County of Putnam, and State Highway Department, from proceeding with a certain described highway project, indicated by blueprints exhibited. Complainant appeals and insists that the Chancellor erred in (1) dissolving the injunction, and (2) dismissing the bill.
Complainant is (1) a taxpayer of the defendants town and county, and also (2) the owner of a bond of the town' for $1,000, part of an aggregate issue of $885,000 of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Bigelow v. DraperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Pitznogle v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Barrington v. CokinosTexas Supreme Court · 1960
- Feltz v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
- Trigg v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.