Legal Opinion

Darwin v. Town of Cookeville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1936PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

The Chancellor sustained a motion to dissolve an injunction in this cause on bill and answer, and dismissed the bill, filed to restrain the defendants, Town of Cooke-ville, County of Putnam, and State Highway Department, from proceeding with a certain described highway project, indicated by blueprints exhibited. Complainant appeals and insists that the Chancellor erred in (1) dissolving the injunction, and (2) dismissing the bill.

Complainant is (1) a taxpayer of the defendants town and county, and also (2) the owner of a bond of the town' for $1,000, part of an aggregate issue of $885,000 of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Bigelow v. DraperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Pitznogle v. Western Maryland RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McClenahan v. CooleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Barrington v. CokinosTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Feltz v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  4. State ex rel. Moulton v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Trigg v. Middle Tennessee Electric Membership Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API