Legal Opinion
William D. Ruffin v. County of Los Angeles, Sherman A. Jones v. County of Los Angeles, David L. Ellis v. County of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1979No. 77-2532PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELY, Circuit Judge:
The appellants are 128 named corrections officers, all male, employed by the appellees, the Los Angeles County (California) Sheriff and the County of Los Angeles (hereinafter the “County”). They appeal the summary judgment dismissal of their employment discrimination claims against the County.
Specifically, the corrections officers claimed that employment practices of the County violated both Title VII of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act (42 U.S.C. § 2000e) and the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. § 206(d)) because female deputy sheriffs who are assigned to work in County…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Abramson v. University of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Branson v. Price River Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Rudolph STECKL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MOTOROLA, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Barthelemy v. Air Lines Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Margaret Spaulding, and James Bush, Intervenors-Appellants v. University of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.