Legal Opinion

Coonrad v. Van Metre

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 13, 1985No. 83-1419PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGIVERIN, Justice.

Plaintiff Douglas V. Coonrad brings two consolidated certiorari actions to review fee allowances made by the defendant district court under Iowa Code sections 815.7 and 663A.5 (1983) for his services in representing several indigent persons in various unrelated criminal prosecutions and postcon-viction proceedings. We annul the writs.

The judges of the first judicial district of Iowa maintain a list of attorneys who have expressed their willingness to accept court appointments to represent indigent defendants in criminal cases and indigent applicants in postconviction…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Parrish v. DenatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  3. Walters v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  4. Mathison v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
  5. Van Meter v. HellwegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. Bremicker v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988
  3. Lewis v. Iowa District Court for Des Moines CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  4. State v. SeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
  5. Bush v. Iowa District Court for Sac CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API