Legal Opinion

Hulse v. Wifvat

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 17, 1981No. 64681PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORMICK, Justice.

In this certiorari case we must interpret section 815.7, The Code, which fixes the standard for compensation of attorneys who are appointed by the court to represent indigent defendants in criminal cases. Plaintiff Gregory A. Hulse, an Adel attorney, brought this action against defendant district Judge Van Wifvat (the district court) to challenge the adequacy of the attorney fee allowed plaintiff for defending Ralph Kuecker, an indigent charged with murder. The questions presented are whether the district court erred in interpreting the statutory requirement of reasonable…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parrish v. DenatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  2. Woodbury County v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  3. State v. LindseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. Furey v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  5. Stanley v. City of IndianolaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  2. McNabb v. OsmundsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  3. In the Interests of A.C.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
  4. English v. MissildineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  5. Recorder's Court Bar Ass'n v. Wayne Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API