State v. See
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLE, Justice.
Defendant, an indigent for whom counsel was appointed by the court, contends the prosecution should not have had a voice in the determination of the fees to be paid his court-appointed attorney. The trial court denied defendant’s several-pronged challenge to the county attorney’s participation in the hearing on counsel’s fee application. We affirm, finding neither a constitutional infirmity nor breach of legal ethics in the fee-setting procedure.
The background facts of this case exemplify the procedure we have previously prescribed for determining reasonable fees to be paid…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kent A. Simmons Vs. State Public DefenderSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- State v. BlankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Shirley L. Johnson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Green v. Iowa District Court for Mills CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Johnson, Shirley L. v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.