Legal Opinion

Mathison v. Young

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 20, 1983No. 67648, 68578, 68583 and 68584PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*478McCORMICK, J.

The question here concerns the legal standard for determining reasonable compensation for an attorney appointed as counsel for indigent parents or children in juvenile cases. Plaintiff Jane M. Mathison brought these consolidated certiorari actions to challenge fee orders entered for her services in four juvenile proceedings by defendant District Associate Judge Gordon Speights Young. We find that defendant employed an incorrect legal standard in the orders and therefore sustain the writs and remand the cases for a new determination of fees.

Section 232.141(1) of the Iowa Code…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. State v. BuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
  3. Parrish v. DenatoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  4. Woodbury County v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
  5. Ferguson v. Pottawattamie CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Walters v. HerrickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Coonrad v. Van MetreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  3. Bush v. Iowa District Court for Sac CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  4. Coonrad v. Van MetreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  5. Mathison v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API