Legal Opinion

Elm v. McKee

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1956No. Civ. 16577PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaufman, J.

Einar E. Elm appeals from a judgment rendered after jury verdict in favor of defendants in an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by him when he struck his head against a barber pole attached to respondents’ premises. The building was owned by respondent McKee and leased by him to respondent Barsamian as a barbershop.

The complaint contained three causes of action: (1) Negligent maintenance of the barber pole in a manner constituting a dangerous condition of the premises; (2) violation of ordinances of the city and county of San Francisco regulating the overhang…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Parker v. WomackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Nevis v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Ford v. CHESLEY TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. Los Gatos Golf CourseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Coates v. ChinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Wilkinson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Gayhart Ex Rel. Gayhart v. SchwabeIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Tannyhill v. Pacific Motor Transport Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API