Legal Opinion

Tannyhill v. Pacific Motor Transport Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1964No. Civ. 20910PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, P. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from judgment, after jury verdict, in favor of defendant.

Questions Presented.

Propriety of instructions (a) on the presumption of negligence arising from a violation of section 22520, Vehicle Code, and (b) on contributory negligence.

Record.

Plaintiff Sylvia Jean Tannyhill is the wife of decedent Willie Maurice Tannyhill; plaintiff Troy Maurice Tannyhill is his minor son. They brought this action against defendant Pacific Motor Transport Company (hereinafter referred to as P.M.T.) for damages for the death of their husband and father, who was killed when a tractor-truck with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Harris v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Barrera v. De La TorreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ostertag v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Wilkinson v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hilts v. County of SolanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Storjohn v. FayNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Beck v. KesslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. Cabral v. Ralphs Grocery Co.California Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Davis v. Pine Mountain Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API