Legal Opinion

City of Pasco v. Napier

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1988No. 53807-7PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

We reverse a superior court judgment against the City of Pasco for 6 months' disability leave pay. We hold that Napier was entitled to immediate disability retirement benefits from the Washington State Retirement Board on his second application for disability retirement because that application was a continuation of Napier's first application and because he had already received the statutory 6-month period of disability leave from the City of Pasco.

Facts

Napier, a fire fighter for the City of Pasco, applied to the Franklin County Disability Board for disability retirement on October 27, 1983.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. StannardWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Nucleonics Alliance v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Matter of Marriage of PrattWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. MehlhornWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  5. City of Longview v. Public Employees' Retirement BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re EatonWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Kirk v. MoeWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Department of Labor & Industries v. AumanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Wellington River Hollow, L.L.C. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. Brown v. Seattle Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API