Matter of Marriage of Pratt
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStafford, J.
Petitioner, Nadine Pratt, challenges a Court of Appeals decision which recognizes an inherent common law power of a trial court to enter a final dissolution decree nunc pro tunc. We hold that a dissolution decree is not final until signed and entered by the trial court. A nunc pro tunc decree may be entered only when necessary to correct ministerial or clerical errors or when mandated by public policy consideration. The Court of Appeals is reversed.
Nadine and Bill Pratt were married on November 11, 1978. Both had been married previously and had children from their former marriages. Four…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Tiedman v. TiedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Garrett v. ByerlyWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- State v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Osborne v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1962
- Crockett v. CrockettWashington Supreme Court · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. SmissaertWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Aetna Life Insurance v. BuntWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Kent v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Aither v. Estate of AitherSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
- Standard Insurance Co. v. SchwalbeWashington Supreme Court · 1988
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.