Legal Opinion

State v. Kimball

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1915No. 2617PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, First District; Hon. J. D. Gall, Judge. Roy Kimball was convicted of adultery. He appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, C. J.

Tbe defendant, a married man, was convicted of adultery, alleged to have been committed witb M., an unmarried woman. He appeals.

1 Similar questions are presented as were presented in tbe case of State v. Sheffield, 45 Utah 426; 146 Pac. 306. The criminal act, as in tbe Sheffield ease, was, in tbe complaint before the magistrate and in tbe information, charged to have been committed on the 23rd of August, 1913. At tbe trial, as in tbe Sheffield ease, the State elected to rely on an act claimed to have been committed on tbe 16th, and offered proof to show tbe commission of it at that time in B.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1897
  5. State v. LayUtah Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. CazierUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. GardnerUtah Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State v. CazierUtah Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API