Legal Opinion

State v. Lay

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 1910No. 2117PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Sixth District; Son. John F. Chidester, Judge. Phil R. Lay was convicted of adultery, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCarty, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of adultery in the 'district court of Garfield County. The act was alleged to have been committed in said county on March 15, 1908.. A sentence of two and one-half years in the state prison was imposed.

The only evidence tending to incriminate appellant and connect him with the crime charged was that given by the *145prosecutrix. She testified that from the last of February, 1908, until some time in May of the same year she was employed at the Cameron Hotel, in Panguitch, Garfield County, Utah; that during this time appellant roomed and boarded at the same…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. State v. CarrOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. ButterfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  4. State v. CorolesUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. CragunUtah Supreme Court · 1934

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API