Legal Opinion

State v. Cazier

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1974No. 13398Published

1Opinion of the Court

521 P.2d 554 (1974)

STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Howard William CAZIER, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 13398.

Supreme Court of Utah.

April 11, 1974.

Robert M. McRae of Hatch, McRae & Richardson, Salt Lake City, for defendant-appellant.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., M. Reid Russell, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, for plaintiff-respondent.

CROCKETT, Justice:

Howard William Cazier appeals from his conviction by a jury of the crime of automobile homicide.[1] He assigns as error the failure of the court to grant his motion to dismiss, on two grounds: (1) that the State had failed to prove…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CrankUtah Supreme Court · 1943
  2. State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. WellsUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. SheffieldUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. State v. HatcherUtah Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API