Legal Opinion

Groff v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 27, 2006No. 05-1049CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

The court has before it the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. Plaintiffs contest the denial by the Bureau of Justice Assistance of the United States Department of Justice (BJA) of benefits under the Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Act of 1976, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3796-3796d-7 (2000 & Supp. Ill 2003, as amended) (PSOBA) for the survivors of Mr. Lawrence Groff. The motions have been fully briefed, and oral argument was heard on June 1, 2006. Plaintiffs’ motion, for the reasons discussed below, is granted.

BACKGROUND1

Plaintiffs request compensation…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Groff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. 210 Earll, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Bice v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  4. Winuk v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  5. LaBare v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API