Legal Opinion

Dibble v. Reliance Life Insurance

California Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1915No. S.F. No. 6449PublishedCited by 44 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.

This ease was ordered retransferred to this court for hearing and determination, by reason of the inability of the justices of the district court of appeal of the third district to concur in a judgment. While the cause was pending in the last named court Mr. Justice Burnett prepared an opinion, which was forwarded to this court, as required by the constitution. That opinion is as follows:

“One of the main points in this controversy growing out of an action for the recovery of a five thousand dollar life insurance involves the -construction of the following provision in the policy:…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Benefit Life Ass'n v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Dwight v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Wright v. Mutual Benefit Life Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Clement v. Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Patterson v. Natural Premium Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Tomerlin v. Canadian Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  2. New York Life Insurance v. HollenderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ebner v. Ohio State Life InsuranceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Missouri State Life Insurance v. CranfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Cohen v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API