Legal Opinion
Carey v. Schuldt
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided July 25, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 13894PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEEBE, District Judge:
This lawsuit was brought by a longshoreman to recover damages for injuries sustained while loading cargo aboard the defendant’s vessel. The defendant impleaded the stevedore, Standard Fruit and Steamship Company (hereafter “Standard”). The plaintiff propounded 37 written interrogatories to both the defendant and the third-party defendant pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 33, which allows written interrogatories to be served upon any “adverse party.” The defendant answered the interrogatories but Standard objected on the grounds that it has not filed an answer…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Herbert Wiggins, Administrator of the Estate of James Wiggins v. City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Williams v. KeyesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- M.V.M., Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Tejas Development Co. v. McGough Bros.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Weitort v. AH Bull & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Archilla v. Smyth Worldwide Movers, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1977
- In Re AucoinDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1993
- Gorman Rupp Industries, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Moore-Harris Abstract Co. v. EstesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.