Legal Opinion

Tyra v. Bob Carroll Construction Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1982No. C-659PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GREENHILL, Chief Justice.

This was a suit by Bob Carroll Construction Company [Carroll] against C. L. Tyra for construction done by Carroll for Tyra. The action was on an open account. Tyra brought a counterclaim for usury “charged” by Carroll. 1 Carroll denied that interest was charged, and offered as a defense any “charges” of interest were the result of an accidental and bona fide error.

As the case reaches us, only the usury problem is involved. Trial was to the court without a jury. Judgment was for Carroll. Tyra’s usury claim was denied. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. PJM, INC. v. Walter Clark Advertising, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Tyra v. Bob Carroll Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gibraltar Savings, Cross-Appellant v. Ldbrinkman Corp., Cross-Appellee, and Lloyd D. Brinkman, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance, Receiver of Americity Federal Savings Bank v. Nicholas K. KraljCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  3. George A. Fuller Co. v. Carpet Services, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Martinez v. Corpus Christi Area Teachers Credit Union, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988
  5. Moore v. White Motor Credit Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API