Legal Opinion

Hess v. BD. OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 29, 2008No. 06-35963PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Circuit Judge:

Willie Fern Hess appeals from the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. He asserts that Oregon Revised Statute § 144.125(3) (1991), 1 which allows the Parole Board to postpone his parole release date if it finds he has “a psychiatric or psychological diagnosis of a present severe emotional disturbance such as to constitute a danger to the health or safety of the community,” is unconstitutionally vague. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

BACKGROUND

Hess is an inmate at the Snake River Correctional…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Woodford v. VisciottiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cheyenne Desertrain v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. Anthony Alphonsus v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. California Pacific Bank v. FdicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Abebe v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Fikre v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API