Legal Opinion
Anthony Alphonsus v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2013No. 10-73298PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BERZON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge GRABER.
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
Our case concerns the “particularly serious crime” concept embodied in our immigration statutes, recently the subject of an extensive opinion by an en banc panel of this Court. See Delgado v. Holder, 648 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc). After deciding various other issues, Delgado remanded the case to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”), concluding that the BIA had not adequately explained why the crime in that case fit into the “particularly serious crime” category…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- James Dimaya v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Antipas Konou v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Roberto Blandino-Medina v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Altin Shuti v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.