Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Murph

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 3, 1954No. 387PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Plaintiff bases his cause of action squarely and solely upon the alleged violation by each defendant of Ch. 425, Sec. 26, Public Laws of 1937, which, as amended, is now codified in G.S. 119-43 and provides as follows:

“Sec. 119-43. Display required on containers used in making deliveries. —Every person delivering at wholesale or retail any gasoline in this State shall deliver the same to the purchaser only in tanks, barrels, casks, cans, or other containers having the word ‘Gasoline’ or the name of such other like products of petroleum, as the case may be, in English, plainly stenciled or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Hall v. Coble Dairies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Kentucky Independent Oil v. Schnitzler, AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
  4. Stone v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Newton v. . Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Hinson v. DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Corprew v. Geigy Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. Inspirational Network, Inc. v. CombsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Gore v. George J. Ball, IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API