Legal Opinion
Coleman v. McLaren
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided March 25, 1986No. 78 C 2117PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
This Court’s October 7, 1985 memorandum opinion and order, 631 F.Supp. 749 (“Opinion III” 1 ) dismissed this action for want of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), by reason of the Tax Injunction Act of 1937 (the “Act,” 28 U.S.C. § 1341) and the more expansive bar imposed by Fair Assessment in Real Estate Association, Inc. v. McNary, 454 U.S. 100, 102 S.Ct. 177, 70 L.Ed.2d 271 (1981). Now the “Lake County Defendants” (Lake County itself, its Board of Review and Robert Jasper) ask for the allowance of a portion of their reasonable…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Schlenz v. CastleIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Doe v. CALUMET CITY, ILL.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Vulk v. HaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Paul Hamer and June Hamer v. County of Lake, Lake County Board of Review, and Its Individual Members, and Robert G. JasperCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Vulk v. HaleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1987