Legal Opinion

County Commissioners' Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1980No. 79-1461PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants argue that there is no reasonable basis for distinguishing between schools and counties and, as a consequence, that the decisions and orders of the commission must be found to be unlawful and unreasonable based upon R. C. 4905.33 and 4905.35. Appellants also contend that the differentiation between counties and schools is violative of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution as well as the substantially equivalent guarantees afforded in Sections 1, 2, 16, and 19 of Article I of the Ohio Constitution.

In the case at bar appellants are arguing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Breard v. AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State, ex rel. Turpin v. Court of Common Pleas of Stark CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Tongren v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ohio Edison Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Vorisek v. Village of North RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Cahill v. Village of LewisburgOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API