Legal Opinion

Vorisek v. Village of North Randall

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1980No. 79-1673PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C. J.

Local Rule 22 of the Eighth Appellate District provides, in relevant part:

“(B) A party filing a notice of appeal or cross-appeal must, within 10 days of the date of filing, serve on all other parties and file with the Clerk of the Court of Appeals a ‘Civil Appeal Statement’ in the form specified in section (C). Filing requirements for all documents (praecipe, record, brief) are not suspended by this requirement.

a * * *

“(E) If a party or counsel for a party fails to comply with this rule, the Court of Appeals may impose sanctions, which may include dismissal of the review proceeding as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cassidy v. GlossipOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Drake v. BucherOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Walters v. GriffithOhio Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeHart v. Aetna Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Meyers v. First Natl. Bank of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Queen City Chapter of Society of Professional Journalists v. McGinnisOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Cavalry Investments v. Dzilinski, 88769 (7-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Humphrey v. Ohio Water Parks, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API